Security Water and Sanitation District
Crisis Communication / Public Education
Located directly south of Colorado Springs, Security Water District serves 19,000 customers. In January 2016, Security Water learned from the news media that they were among 94 water supply sources that exceeded the EPA's PFC provisional health advisory. Significant news coverage alarmed area customers and so began months of testing, communicating and reassuring customers that Security Water was doing everything they could to address the problem.
Sigler Communications was hired to develop a communications and outreach strategy to communicate with customers and the news media. Our team developed the plan of action and then quickly educated customers on the issue and what they needed to know. Security Water adopted a very transparent communications posture and provided information on the situation and steps the District was taking to rectify the problem. Local and national news media was used to communicate information in addition to content generation for the District including bill stuffers, fact sheets, maps, website content and social media.
While customer concern and outrage was very high, it was not directed at Security Water District. Security Water implemented a number of interim strategies in record time to get 100 percent of its customers on PFC-free surface water. Customer confidence in the District remains high and regulatory agencies lauded the way in which Security Water handled these issues.
Flagship Crisis Communications Case
The project at a glance
District served
19,000 customers
Incident timing
January 2016
Public-health context
EPA PFC provisional health advisory
Outcome
100% of customers moved to PFC-free surface water
Project Arc
A public-health issue with immediate scrutiny
Security Water learned from news media that it was among 94 water supply sources exceeding the EPA’s PFC provisional health advisory. Significant coverage quickly alarmed customers, prompting months of testing, customer communication, and interim-response work.
Stakeholder Map
Who had to understand the work — and how
Customers
Used a transparent posture and direct education about the issue, what the District knew, and the actions underway.
Local and national media
Provided consistent information while the District implemented interim strategies.
Regulatory agencies
Maintained a response that regulators later lauded for its handling of the issue.
Communications Artifacts
What the project team put into the field
- Crisis communications and outreach strategy
- Bill stuffers
- Fact sheets and maps
- Website content
- Social media content
- Local and national media communications
What the Work Demonstrates
The documented challenge was high customer concern and national attention. The response demonstrates that transparent, sustained information can keep concern focused on the problem — rather than directed at the utility responsible for solving it.
Project Questions
What prospective clients often want to know
What triggered Security Water District’s crisis response?
In January 2016, the District learned that its supply was among sources exceeding the EPA’s PFC provisional health advisory.
How did the District communicate with customers?
The program used a transparent posture supported by bill stuffers, fact sheets, maps, website content, social media, and media relations.
What was the outcome?
The District implemented interim strategies in record time to get all customers on PFC-free surface water, while customer confidence remained high.
Related Proof
Explore the practice behind the project
Project Details
Sector
Water
Service Type
Crisis Communication / Public Education
Location
Security, CO
Project Phase
Crisis
Related Practice
Crisis Communications Practice →